About your Search

20120925
20121003
Search Results 0 to 10 of about 11 (some duplicates have been removed)
, if i were the obama administration, and i'm not, but i stand here watching this i would've made this a priority. >> there are several efforts underway to get a constitutional amendment that would reverse citizens united. where did -- what's your stand on that? >> well, i think talking about this issue is really important to a modern democracy. we need to recognize where we are. i think we need to recognize that we're in trouble and we need to make changes. constitutional amendment is like climbing mount everest. it's the hardest thing out there you could possibly do. so it may be the only way to get there, but my own view is it is really worth exploring all the other ways to get to where we want to go before saying, "we have to go up and down the mountain to do it." you have to get the super majority in congress to send it to the states to get the super majority of the states. whereas, you know, if you could pass pure disclosure, that would be a start, and that can be done without any super majority of states at all. if you could get the i.r.s. going, if you could get the obama
official in new york. meanwhile, the obama administration is still trying to determine who was responsible for the assault on the u.s. mission in benghazi that killed a u.s. ambassador earlier this month. >> i think pretty clearly it was a terrorist attack. >> brown: at the pentagon today, defense secretary leon panetta seemed to have little doubt about what happened at the u.s. consulate in libya more than two weeks ago. >> a group of terrorists obviously conducted that attack on the consulate and against our individuals. what terrorists were involved, i think, remains to bdetermined by an investigation, but it clearly was a group of terrorists who conducted that attack against the facility. >> brown: what seemed clear today, though, had seemed less so just days ago. the original explanation for what happened the evening of september 11 was that an america-made movie denigrating islam had incited a mob, which had then stormed the u.s. consulate in benghazi. that attack left four americans dead, including u.s. ambassador to libya, christopher stephens. but in the weeks since, even as prot
to people like me, for example. >> narrator: the obama administration may soon reverse the bush stem cell policy, and scientific breakthroughs may open up whole new approaches less reliant on embryonic stem cells. still, parkinson's remains a race between the disease and the ock. back home in the bay area, i met up again with tom shearer, who i'd first gotten to know at the parkinson's exercise class. it was tom who first said to me that this wasn't a battle he thought he could win. >> reach. look at your knee more. good. there you go. >> narrator: what worries tom and his wife madeleine now isn't so much the struggle to keep moving, but the battle everyone dreads, the one that involves your mind. >> one of the real major problems that i think almost anybody with parkinson's has, which is the memory aspect. i don't know where that's going to lead. >> there was a long period when tom would go out and get lost, and neighbors would call us and say, "come and get him, he's at the corner of such and such." >> i did get lost in downtown oakland, which, if you've lived in the area, you know, you
it was at the beginning of the obama administration in 2000-- 2008/2009? >> i have said i don't want to talk about something that would affect-- that would affect the u.s. elections. but i n ste my o desires. i think, i think that the current situation between iran and the u.s. is to both parties disadvantage. there is certainly much room for improvement. why should the u.s. government be in conflict with us i haven't really been able to understand this so far. and i'm a political person. has the united states government have any gains, i'm not saying we have had any gains. no, we certainly didn't have any gains. whyshould we be in conflict with each other this is a serious question. >> rose: it's a very serious question. >> after all the american politicians should sit down and answer this question. why should we disagree with one another. >> rose: and i will ask them but what about your side? what can you do, what are you prepared to do, what changes have you made in terms of your attitude about the united states. your willingness to meet them halfway? >> you personally, you personally know that
you get any sense that the ethanol mandate is going to change under either administration under obama or if romney would get elected? >> well is sure seems like the word ethanol has turned into a pejorative and it's not exactly the most positive topic. i just don't know that turning food into gasoline is necessarily what we want to be doing in the long term. >> reporter: and it affects this market? >> you bet it does. as corn prices go up cattle prices go up. simple as that. that's an input cost to feeding cattle is corn, so you've got to take cattle prices higher to offset that. >> reporter: thanks very much. >> you bet. >> tom: a quiet ending to the third quarter for stocks the major indices falling. the s&p 500 spent the entire session in negative territory. it made three failed attempts to get to unchanged before closing down a half percent. trading volume picked up to end the quarter. 830 million shares on the big board. just under 1.9 billion on the nasdaq. nine of the ten major stock sectors were lower today. telecommunications fell 0.8%. technology dropped 0.7% and materials f
the sacking at the u.s. embassy, the killing of the ambassador. the administration did not on that story to coexist with their theme and how great an anti terror policy obama had. they deceived the country, sending susan rice out on the sunday shows and attending that this was the outcrop -- outgrowth of a demonstration. everybody over the age of nine could see that it was premeditated. that is why it was ppressed until it could no longer be suppressed. >> i am not aware of the conspiracy that charles has his own strange and wonderful sources -- >> how do you explain her -- >> i am going to try to explain my moderator's question about this. the problems were pulle -- the problem republicans have is that mitt romney has never c cracked the threshold of being a possible commander in chief. it does punish the obama record, and there's no question that osama bin laden took the wind out of the cells of the republican candidates. it was an enormous credential for obama. but because romney chose paul ryan, he in no way filled out the emptiness of his own resume in foreign policy. for that reaso
stories. now, back to gwen. >> ifill: we return to president obama's unitedded nations' speech and what it tells us about his administration's foreign policy challenges. for that we turn to harvard university professor and former u.s. ambassador nicholas burns and richard haas, president of the council on foreign relations. welcome to you both. starting with you, richard haas, let's take an overview. is the obama foreign policy defendable four years later? >> for sure it's defendable. it's not to say it's flawless. but he can point to obviously the killing of osama bin laden. he can point to, among other things, the attempt to improve relations with china and russia. obviously he's got the uwe united states out of ira the united states after going up has now come down to some extent in afghanistan. the middle east, even though it's turbulent, is more open than it was. so i think the president in general can point to some areas where he moved forward and some areas obviously his critics will say where he movedded back. all in all it's a defense i believe and defendable record. >> ifill:
administration also would not provide additional funds to cover more recipients during a recession. in contrast to how the law currently works. president obama argues that romney's proposal would cut coverage and services to the needy including seniors. >> here's the deal the states would be getting. they would have to be running these programs in the face of the largest cut to medicaid that has ever been proposed. a cut that according to one nonpartisan group would take away health care for about 19 million americans. 19 million. >> sreenivasan: bob green stein is the founder and president of the center on budget and policy priorities. he says governor romney's block grant proposal would hurt many patients. >> the biggest changes would be for the elderly and the disabled. the elderly and disabled are one quarter of medicaid beneficiaries but two thirds of the cost. that will rise as the population ages and there is no way you can extract savings of this magnitude without dramatickic reductns in health care for low-income people who are seniors or who have disables. >> sreenivasan: greenstein s
Search Results 0 to 10 of about 11 (some duplicates have been removed)